1993 Dbq New England vs. Chesapeake - 1314 Words

New England vs. Chesapeake While both the people of the New England region and of the Chesapeake region descended from the same English origin, by 1700 both regions had traveled in two diverse directions. Since both of these groups were beset with issues that were unique to their regions and due to their exposure to different circumstances, each was forced to rethink and reconstruct their societies. As a result, the differences in the motivation, geography, and government in the New England and Chesapeake regions caused great divergence in the development of each. As the regions began to expand and develop, their motivations for settlement helped to mold their societies. New England was a place where men sought refuge from religious†¦show more content†¦Since land meant power in the Chesapeake, a rigid social hierarchy was developed as well, completely in contrast with the society of the New England region. These contrasts were brought about by the positive and negative impacts off the geography in each region. It strongly influenced the New England and Chesapeake regions in unique and separate ways. The Chesapeake also had its own obstacle brought about by nature. Diseases such as dysentery, malaria, and typhoid struck hard, cutting off numerous years of life expectancy for the people of the Chesapeake. Since health is a major concern for a developing colony, disease in a colony tends to eat at the morale of a town. This was demonstrated in the Chesapeake where disease cost many colonists their lives, especially women, leaving many men frustrate with little hope for having families. This harsh reality along with the arduous voyage decreased the amount of women and children who immigrated to the region (Doc C,F). Unlike their Southern counterparts, New England was healthier and not ravaged by disease. The cleaner conditions increased the colonists’ life expectancy by several years. Because of the thriving conditions of the New England society, many English emigrants emigrated with their entire family, as exemplified in Document B, â€Å"Joseph Hull†¦Agnes Hull, his w ife†¦Joan Hull, his daughter†¦Joseph Hull, his son†. Unlike most Chesapeake children who would be lucky if they lived to see both their parents, the New